Labour Party member Baroness Alexander says discussion is timely given Imran’s ‘deteriorating welfare’
A debate is underway in the United Kingdom’s House of Lords over Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan’s detention and health
Imran has been imprisoned since August 2023 and is currently serving a sentence at Adiala Jail in a £190 million corruption case. He also faces pending trials under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) related to the May 9, 2023, protests.
Initiating the debate, Labour Party member Baroness Alexander of Cleveden said the discussion was timely given Imran’s “deteriorating welfare”, citing concerns over his health, conditions of detention, access to medical care, denial of family visits and recurring questions regarding access to justice.
The house would debate on treatment of Imran khan in prison and position of UK government on the issue.
The debate comes a day after Kasim Khan, son of the PTI founder, addressed the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), urging the body to intervene and press the Pakistani government for the immediate release of his father.
Read: Kasim urges UNHRC intervention to end Imran’s persecution, detention immediately
The former prime minister’s sons have not seen him since November 2022, following an assassination attempt. They said they applied for visas in January of this year, but have yet to receive a response.
However, the PTI founder was allowed to telephone his sons from Adiala Jail on Eid day, speaking with them for around 25 to 30 minutes. During the call, his sons inquired about his health, while Imran expressed happiness at being able to speak to them on the festive occasion. He was brought out of the compound to a special room for the call and returned to the compound afterwards.
Last week, Jemima Goldsmith, the ex-wife of Imran, made a direct appeal to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to allow their sons to visit their father in prison.
In response, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said that the sons of Imran do not require visas to visit Pakistan to meet their father, upon which Jemima replied that the government was refusing visas for their sons, in an attempt to deprive them of British protection in the case of a possible arrest upon arrival in Pakistan.
