Backchannels bring Iran-US talks back on track

A staff member removes the Iranian flag from the stage after a group picture with foreign ministers and representatives of the US, Iran, China, Russia, Britain, Germany, France and the European Union during the Iran nuclear talks at the Vienna International Centre in Vienna, Austria July 14, 2015. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE


ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan is set to host what could be the decisive round of talks between Iran and the US, as a series of critical confidence-building measures by both sides on Friday revived hopes for a landmark agreement, diplomatic sources said.

They said delegations from Tehran and Washington agreed in principle to travel to Islamabad for the next round, very soon.

The move follows an intense phase of behind-the-scenes diplomacy led by Pakistan after the initial round of talks failed to produce a breakthrough.

Sources described the upcoming engagement as “crucial,” with momentum restored after what they termed as “unprecedented diplomatic efforts” by Islamabad to prevent the process from collapsing.

Pakistan’s role as a mediator was initially met with scepticism, even within policy circles at home.

Questions were raised about whether Islamabad possessed the leverage and credibility to bridge the deep mistrust between Iran and the United States, and more importantly, to avert a potential military escalation.

However, instead of public grandstanding, Pakistan quietly pursued a calibrated strategy of engagement with both sides.

Against the odds, Islamabad first managed to secure a two-week ceasefire, creating the space necessary for diplomacy to take root.

This was followed by a rare face-to-face meeting between Iranian and US officials in Islamabad, a significant milestone, even though it failed to resolve key differences.

Diplomatic insiders say the real breakthrough came afterwards.

With the peace process hanging in the balance and Tehran deeply distrustful of Washington’s intentions, Pakistan escalated its efforts. In a high-stakes move, Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir travelled to Tehran to engage directly with the Iranian leadership.

The visit, described by officials as “consequential,” proved pivotal in removing key bottlenecks that had stalled progress.

The outcome was swift. A ceasefire in Lebanon was announced, while Iran took the reciprocal step of reopening the Strait of Hormuz, developments widely seen as essential confidence-building measures to sustain dialogue.

Analysts believe Pakistan’s effectiveness as a mediator stems from a combination of strategic factors.

While Islamabad maintains close ties with Tehran and has also cultivated a working relationship with the Trump administration, observers argue that its influence goes beyond traditional diplomacy.

Pakistan’s status as a nuclear power, coupled with its strong military and deep understanding of regional security dynamics, gave it unique leverage.

Unlike conventional mediators such as Oman or Qatar, Pakistan was able to factor in the broader geostrategic environment, including nuclear considerations, proxy conflicts, and its defence ties with key regional players such as Saudi Arabia.

Using these levers, Islamabad conveyed a clear message to Tehran that the current window for a deal represented a strategic opportunity, one that might not remain open indefinitely.

At the same time, Pakistan engaged Washington at the highest levels, urging restraint and emphasising the need to prevent any potential spoilers from derailing the process.

Despite the progress, officials caution against premature optimism.

Ever since US President Donald Trump signalled his willingness to travel to Islamabad for the signing of a potential agreement, a wave of optimism has gripped sections of the media. However, diplomats stress that the negotiations remain complex and far from concluded.

“A deal is only done when it is done,” said a source.

While there is broad agreement on several issues, negotiations on more contentious points are still ongoing. The process involves detailed, step-by-step engagement, requiring patience, precision, and sustained trust-building between parties with decades of hostility.

Officials also warn of persistent risks, including domestic political pressures in both countries and the possibility of external spoilers attempting to undermine progress.

Leave a Comment